The Division and Methods of the Sciences

by Thomas Aquinas · Super Boetium De Trinitate, qq. 5-6

Assigned by 1 of the 9 reading lists, catalogue entry only

Written
c. 1257-1259
Language
Latin
Length
Short · 110 ppunder 120 pages
Difficulty
Difficult4 of 5 for a first-year reader

We recommendThe Division and Methods of the Sciences, translated by Armand MaurerPontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1986The standard English text of questions five and six, with a substantial introduction.

These links go straight to Amazon and Bookshop.org and earn this site nothing today. Prices are the same either way. How this works.

Questions five and six of Aquinas' early commentary on Boethius' short treatise on the Trinity, published on their own under this title. Question five asks how the theoretical sciences are divided into natural philosophy, mathematics and metaphysics, and by what kind of abstraction each considers its object. Question six asks what method suits each science, whether reason or intellect leads, and whether the human mind can see the divine form in this life. The text is a compact statement of how Aquinas thinks knowledge is organised.

No reading guide yet

The catalogue entry above is complete: the dates, the form, the themes and every program that assigns The Division and Methods of the Sciences are verified against each program's published list.

What is missing is the part that takes real work: the summary, the key passages, and a recommended translation. The edition named below is the one most programs assign, so the buy links are useful already.

Browse the 48 works that do have a guide →

Super Boetium De Trinitate, qq. 5-6, Commentary on Boethius' De Trinitate Questions V and VI, De Trinitate Commentary, Boethius, abstraction, natural philosophy, mathematics, metaphysics, separatio, theoretical sciences, St. Thomas Aquinas, Thomas of Aquino, Doctor Angelicus